6/19/2023 0 Comments Deltacad delete within layersIn this downloadable video webinar, I teach you the best Productivity tips, tricks, and techniques I've learned over my 15 years of drafting and design with AutoCAD. I added PDF's for those that desire better clarity.AutoCAD Productivity Webinar/Training Video Overall, I am very happy with the progress and accuaracy.Īs you will see in the below drawing, I decided to not cant the stern half frames, when I did this in mock up, the station frames no longer followed the Chapelle drawings. Still unsure about the rising wood termination point - may need to revise it. Doing research on that now and am using the Niagra as my primary source.ĭoes anyone have examples or input? Looking for advice here. I still have to finish the deadwood, stern knee and adjust the inner sternpost. Once those measurements are established, there is really only one way to mark the bearding line - along the edge of the lower feet. This would include the points where the upper and lower end of the stern half frame feet would sit. Prior to laying out the deadwood, I transferred all the relevent dimesions from the frames. Working on the stern deadwood as noted in the photo below. Perfect human drawings are no match for the computer. As a result, many of the lines on the original plans must be recalculated as a result of such tight tollerances. The one downside (if you can call it that) is that the program is accurate to the thousand of an inch or more. Some of the lines in this drawing are for reference and will be erased or hidden in a different layer of the program. You really get to understand why the rabbet changes angle and why the rising wood must rise. Its really interesting to calculate these things as you move fore and aft. The sill is 6" high and will foreshorten the frame by that amount.Īs you will note from my previous posts, I have become a bit obsessed with rising wood, rabbet, and keel. You will also notice that I added some filler pieces where there was a space beside a frame at the gun port as well as a sill. I overlaid the midship frame to show the relationship of the keel assembly to Sheer Plan. At any rate, below is a screen shot showing some framing detail. I have finished all the frames and am now onto the Sheer Plan. I continue to make progress using DeltaCAD. But then again,with the Peacock, I get to experiment to see what was logical and what will fit. Among other things, the rising wood and stern deadwood are already done for you. I will go back and redo the Essex framing plan using CAD, since I found a few errors in my early calculations.įor those considering CAD drawing, I would recommend starting with a ship where there is already a good set of plans published, such as the AOTS series. When I get a little further along, I may consider a tutorial, but for now need to hone my skills. As for tutorials, Dave has a few nice segments regarding the GH that peaked my interest and our new member Bill Edgin recommended this program and answered questions along the way. I probably have a solid 100 hours easily invested in drawings which means that my other projects have stalled for the time being. Regarding CAD drawing, I view it as a hobby within a hobby. This is within reach of the average modeler, so long as you are patient and determined. If you are interested in learning CAD drawing, I am happy to help as I am sure Bill and Dave are as well. Next is to finish these drawings, redo the sheer plan, half-breadth, framing plan, keel plan and then make a jig plan. And, I havent even scratched the surface of what is possible. This exercise has enabled me to better understand the relationship between all the parts of a ship. In addition, the CAD drawing is extreamly accurate as compared to lofting by hand. Once the body plan was imported and I got up to speed, I estimate that I can knock out a full set of frame drawings in a fraction of the time it would take by hand. Overall, I am extreamly satisfied with CAD drawing. I still need to mark gun ports and jig line.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |